Is It Alderman Or Alderwoman
Language constantly evolves with social, cultural, and political changes. Titles and official terms often come under scrutiny as society becomes more aware of gender representation and inclusivity. One such term is ‘alderman,’ traditionally used to refer to a member of a municipal council. With growing awareness around gender equality in language, people often ask whether ‘alderman’ is still appropriate or if ‘alderwoman’ or another gender-neutral term should be used instead. The answer depends on context, usage, and institutional preferences.
Understanding the Origin of ‘Alderman’
The word ‘alderman’ comes from Old Englishealdorman, which originally meant ‘elder man’ or ‘senior person.’ It was used in Anglo-Saxon England to describe high-ranking officials. Over time, the term became institutionalized in local governments across English-speaking countries, especially in the UK and the US. In the United States, many cities, especially in states like Illinois, adopted ‘alderman’ as the official title for elected council members.
Despite its masculine origin, ‘alderman’ evolved into a job title that was used regardless of the officeholder’s gender. However, in recent decades, as gender-inclusive language gained traction, the appropriateness of this term has come into question.
Is ‘Alderman’ Gender-Specific?
Technically, ‘alderman’ contains the word ‘man,’ which suggests a masculine bias. However, in practice, it has often been used as a gender-neutral title. Female members of city councils have historically been called aldermen as well, especially in jurisdictions where no alternative term was formally adopted. But just because a term has been used for both genders doesn’t mean it’s neutral or inclusive in the eyes of everyone.
Usage in Practice
- In cities like Chicago, women serving in council positions are still referred to as aldermen in official city documents.
- Some cities and towns have moved toward the use of ‘alderwoman’ to reflect the gender of the officeholder more accurately.
- Other municipalities have embraced gender-neutral terms such as ‘council member’ or simply ‘councilor.’
Is ‘Alderwoman’ an Accepted Term?
Yes, ‘alderwoman’ is increasingly used to refer to women who serve on city councils, especially in informal or media settings. While it is not universally adopted, the term is grammatically correct and aligns with other gender-specific titles such as ‘congresswoman’ or ‘chairwoman.’
However, the adoption of ‘alderwoman’ can be inconsistent. Some officeholders choose to be addressed as ‘alderman’ to reflect the title’s traditional usage, while others prefer ‘alderwoman’ or a non-gendered term to reflect modern values. It often comes down to personal or institutional preference.
The Move Toward Gender-Neutral Titles
In many spheres, the push for gender-neutral job titles has been strong. Terms like ‘firefighter’ have replaced ‘fireman,’ and ‘police officer’ is now preferred over ‘policeman.’ This trend is also influencing political and governmental terminology.
Why Gender-Neutral Language Matters
- It promotes inclusivity and equality by avoiding language that may feel exclusive or outdated.
- It prevents assumptions about a person’s gender based on their job title.
- It reflects a commitment to progressive and respectful communication.
In this context, many suggest using ‘council member’ instead of ‘alderman’ or ‘alderwoman,’ especially when addressing groups or writing official communications. This shift ensures clarity and inclusivity while eliminating the gendered nature of older titles.
Examples from Real-Life Government Use
Municipalities around the world are adopting different strategies when it comes to this issue. Here’s how some handle it:
- Chicago, Illinois: Official documents still use ‘alderman,’ even for women. However, some female council members self-identify as ‘alderwoman.’
- Madison, Wisconsin: The term ‘alder’ is used as a gender-neutral alternative. This removes the issue altogether and is a simple, elegant solution.
- New York City: The City Council uses ‘council member’ regardless of gender, embracing neutral terminology in all cases.
These examples show a spectrum of approaches. Some places retain tradition, while others fully embrace inclusivity through updated language.
Grammatical Considerations
From a linguistic standpoint, both ‘alderman’ and ‘alderwoman’ are grammatically correct. English allows the creation of gender-specific nouns in many professions and roles, and their acceptance depends on common usage. The term ‘alderwoman’ follows the same pattern as other accepted compound nouns and is understood easily by most English speakers.
Still, grammar alone does not dictate what’s most appropriate or respectful. That decision involves cultural, political, and social awareness, especially in public-facing roles.
What Term Should Be Used?
The choice between ‘alderman,’ ‘alderwoman,’ or a gender-neutral term like ‘council member’ should consider the following:
- Institutional Policy: Check whether your local government uses a specific title officially.
- Personal Preference: Respect the title chosen by the individual officeholder.
- Audience and Context: In formal documents, using gender-neutral terms might be more appropriate. In casual settings, personal preferences might prevail.
Tips for Inclusive Language
- When in doubt, use neutral terms like ‘council member.’
- If referring to a specific individual, use the title they prefer.
- Be consistent in your terminology within the same document or discussion.
Balancing Tradition and Progress
The question of whether it should be ‘alderman’ or ‘alderwoman’ is ultimately about balancing linguistic tradition with social progress. ‘Alderman’ is still widely used and accepted in many municipalities, but it carries gendered implications that may feel outdated to some. ‘Alderwoman’ is a valid and increasingly recognized alternative that emphasizes gender clarity.
At the same time, the movement toward inclusive, gender-neutral language is strong and growing. Terms like ‘council member’ or ‘alder’ provide practical, respectful options that fit today’s standards of equity and inclusion. As with many aspects of language, context, clarity, and respect should guide our choices.